Introduction & Site MapTime to BlogFront Page Views & What's NewGlossaryThe PlanHealth-careEnviromentPersonal ChoicesPersonal EndorsementsForumGuestbookCONTRIBUTIONSContact MeBulletin BoardMiscBIO, Pics, & PersonalTravel Blog & Shout-outsBibliographyArchives
Les4TxGov
The People's Choice Candidate

Forum

Forum  >  Same Sex Marriage

My position on this subject is on the Introduction page under "Nothing to do with being Governor" topic.  People misunderstand the power of a Texas Governor, he cannot arbitrarily decide to allow or prohibit any Civil Act, that is what the Legislators do.  But this issue has come up in several emails from viewers, so let's start a discussion.

I support Freedom of Speech and free expression, but I want Civil Discourse not an all out war, or flaming.  I reserve the right to edit or remove any content posted here.  So be nice and intelligent, or go home.

Glenda Backman
2/24/2010 3:34:41 PM
I was very interested in what you said about several issues on your website; I didn't however, under your personal view section see what your views are on same sex marriages and abortion. Are you for or against?

Glenda Backman
Robert Matthey
2/24/2010 3:36:51 PM
More than a word, the importnant thing is true equality. Saying "civil union" or "domestic partnership" is like saying "Homo sapiens" or "bipedal primate" in place of "human." But, it's just a word, right? Thank you for answering the question.
Administrator
2/24/2010 3:40:45 PM
I put those two items on the Intro page under "Nothing to do with being Governor".  The realities are that the Governor of Texas has no power to change either one of those issues in either direction.  In Campaigns we get sidetracked by issues which really never come into play during a term of service.
 
Having said that, I am for everyone having the same rights as anyone else, but not for offending people unnecessarily.
 
The fight over "Same Sex Marriage" started back in the eighties and Nineties as a struggle to get rights under the Tax Law Laws and Insurance Coverage for Homosexual couples equal to that of Heterosexual couples.  When the regress was not addressed, the groups in support of equality decided to use a backdoor, "If they will only give these Tax exemptions and Ins Coverage to "Married Couples", let's get married", and so the fight began.
 
There would never had been an issue if the Homosexual couples had been treated like the Citizens they are.  They should have had the Tax and Ins. options that Hetero couples had.  Now the fight has become something that it never was meant to be, the fight over a word.
 
In this Politically correct Society, you cannot use the word "Faggot" to refer to a Homosexual because it offends them, yet it offends the majority of Americans when Homosexual couples want to use the word "Marriage" instead of an equally suitable word for "Domestic Coupling".  My view is equality for all, if the Hetero portion of society can't use a word because it is considered offensive, then the Homosexual portion cannot use a word for the EXACT same reason.
 
So the answer to this question is:
 
   1) I fully support the right of individuals to seek a long-term monogamous relationship with another Human Being, regardless of sex
 
   2) I fully support the equal rights and privileges inherent in certain acts by the populace
 
   3) I do not support the use of the word "Marriage" for Same-Sex Couples

3 items total
Add New Reply
Author*
Reply*
Please type the confirmation code you see on the image*
Reload image



Introduction & Site MapTime to BlogFront Page Views & What's NewGlossaryThe PlanHealth-careEnviromentPersonal ChoicesPersonal EndorsementsForumGuestbookCONTRIBUTIONSContact MeBulletin BoardMiscBIO, Pics, & PersonalTravel Blog & Shout-outsBibliographyArchives